Progress against the field
Paweł Gramacki has gained 1:28 on the field from Warsaw 2026 to Stockholm 2026.
Over the same races everyone got 3:26 slower, so 1:58 slower on the clock looks worse than it was.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown. The summary above covers Individual Pro · Men, the one raced most; every comparison is in the list below.
Every race
15 races · 13 events
-
Gdansk10 Oct 2026Individual Pro · Men1:02:5321/286Beat 93%
-
Stockholm18 Jun 2026Doubles Open · Mixed56:3589/825Beat 89%
↑ 63 days after Warsaw 2026, with Hanna Sznajder 1:34 better than the field Slower on the clock, ahead of the field Why ↓Close ↑
0:40 slower on the clock in a race that was 2:14 slower for everyone: 1:34 gained on the field, which the clock hides.
The fieldCompare these two →2:14 slower This pair0:40 slower -
Stockholm18 Jun 2026Individual Pro · Men1:01:35150/767Beat 80%
↑ 63 days after Warsaw 2026 1:28 better than the field Slower on the clock, ahead of the field Why ↓Close ↑
1:58 slower on the clock in a race that was 3:26 slower for everyone: 1:28 gained on the field, which the clock hides.
The fieldCompare these two →3:26 slower This athlete1:58 slower -
Warsaw16 Apr 2026Doubles Open · Mixed55:55 PB8/756Beat 99%
-
Warsaw16 Apr 2026Individual Pro · Men59:37 PB42/556Beat 92%
-
Mechelen26 Mar 2026Individual Pro · Men1:03:1262/457Beat 86%
-
Poznan13 Dec 2025Individual Pro · Men1:01:5622/345Beat 94%
↑ 78 days after Rome 2025 1:03 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
0:57 faster on the clock looks better than it was: the race was 2:00 faster for everyone, which leaves this 1:03 behind the field.
The fieldCompare these two →2:00 faster This athlete0:57 faster -
Gdansk12 Oct 2025Doubles Pro · Men55:48 PB6/72Beat 92%
-
Rome26 Sep 2025Individual Pro · Men1:02:5315/199Beat 93%
↑ 167 days after Warsaw 2025 1:20 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
2:46 slower on the clock in a race that was 1:26 slower for everyone: 1:20 lost to the field.
The fieldCompare these two →1:26 slower This athlete2:46 slower -
Warsaw12 Apr 2025Individual Pro · Men1:00:0710/213Beat 95%
↑ 161 days after Poznan 2024 0:50 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
3:14 faster on the clock, yet the race was 4:04 faster for everyone, so 0:50 was lost on the field.
The fieldCompare these two →4:04 faster This athlete3:14 faster -
Poznan2 Nov 2024Individual Pro · Men1:03:2112/193Beat 94%
↑ 252 days after Katowice 2024 0:21 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
3:30 faster on the clock, and the race was 3:09 faster for everyone, so 0:21 of it was this athlete.
The fieldCompare these two →3:09 faster This athlete3:30 faster -
Katowice24 Feb 2024Individual Pro · Men1:06:516/108Beat 94%
↑ 168 days after Warschau 2023 4:51 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
5:12 faster on the clock looks better than it was: the race was 10:03 faster for everyone, which leaves this 4:51 behind the field.
The fieldCompare these two →10:03 faster This athlete5:12 faster -
Warschau9 Sep 2023Individual Pro · Men1:12:0310/55Beat 82%
-
Madrid26 Nov 2022Individual Pro · Men1:12:2029/106Beat 73%
-
World Championships NiceDate unknownIndividual Pro · Men1:07:24159/830Beat 81%