Progress against the field
From London Excel 2025 to London Olympia 2026, Emma Holmes got 27:46 faster than the field.
Over the same races everyone got 1:24 quicker, so 29:10 faster on the clock looks better than it was.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown. The summary above covers Individual Open · Women, the one raced most; every comparison is in the list below.
Every race
10 races · 9 events
-
London Olympia24 Mar 2026Individual Open · Women1:17:06 PB12/180Beat 93%
↑ 110 days after London Excel 2025 27:46 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
29:10 faster on the clock, and the race was 1:24 faster for everyone, so 27:46 of it was this athlete.
The fieldCompare these two →1:24 faster This athlete29:10 faster -
Glasgow11 Mar 2026Doubles Pro · Women1:12:39 PB12/43Beat 72%
-
London Excel4 Dec 2025Individual Open · Women1:46:161277/1542Beat 17%
-
Birmingham22 Oct 2025Doubles Open · Women1:48:59856/904Beat 5%
-
London3 May 2025Doubles Pro · Women1:22:26152/233Beat 35%
-
London3 May 2025Relay · Mixed1:01:3517/137Beat 88%
-
Malaga21 Mar 2025Doubles Open · Mixed1:17:09340/693Beat 51%
↑ 56 days after Manchester 2025, with Mark Holmes 3:18 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
3:18 behind the field: 1:16 slower on the clock, against 2:02 faster for everyone.
The fieldCompare these two →2:02 faster This pair1:16 slower -
Manchester24 Jan 2025Doubles Open · Mixed1:15:53 PB311/733Beat 58%
-
Birmingham15 Oct 2022Doubles Open · Women1:44:52 PB284/309Beat 8%
-
MelbourneDate unknownDoubles Open · Mixed1:15:56270/749Beat 64%