Progress against the field
From Manchester 2026 to Birmingham 2026, the field gained 1:15 on Ashley Woodhouse.
The clock says 2:54 faster, but the races themselves got 4:09 quicker for everyone.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown. The summary above covers Individual Pro · Men, the one raced most; every comparison is in the list below.
Every race
15 races · 12 events
-
Birmingham31 Oct 2026Individual Pro · Men1:12:20261/693Beat 62%
↑ 234 days after Glasgow 2026 0:54 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
0:50 faster on the clock, yet the race was 1:44 faster for everyone, so 0:54 was lost on the field.
The fieldCompare these two →1:44 faster This athlete0:50 faster -
Glasgow11 Mar 2026Individual Pro · Men1:13:1065/140Beat 54%
↑ 49 days after Manchester 2026 0:21 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
2:04 faster on the clock looks better than it was: the race was 2:25 faster for everyone, which leaves this 0:21 behind the field.
The fieldCompare these two →2:25 faster This athlete2:04 faster -
Turin30 Jan 2026Individual Open · Men1:04:33 PB38/1511Beat 98%
-
Manchester21 Jan 2026Doubles Open · Mixed1:00:59 PB36/824Beat 96%
-
Manchester21 Jan 2026Individual Pro · Men1:15:1461/121Beat 50%
-
Stockholm18 Dec 2025Individual Pro · Men1:08:18 PB70/247Beat 72%
-
Poznan13 Dec 2025Individual Pro · Men1:08:5684/345Beat 76%
-
London Excel4 Dec 2025Individual Pro · Men1:09:42154/467Beat 67%
↑ 22 days after Dublin 2025 1:03 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
0:36 faster on the clock looks better than it was: the race was 1:39 faster for everyone, which leaves this 1:03 behind the field.
The fieldCompare these two →1:39 faster This athlete0:36 faster -
Dublin12 Nov 2025Individual Pro · Men1:10:1840/147Beat 73%
↑ 21 days after Birmingham 2025 5:54 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
5:54 better than the field: 7:04 faster on the clock, against 1:10 faster for everyone.
The fieldCompare these two →1:10 faster This athlete7:04 faster -
Dublin12 Nov 2025Individual Pro · Men1:14:0560/115Beat 48%
-
Birmingham22 Oct 2025Individual Open · Men1:07:49165/1821Beat 91%
↑ 26 days after Rome 2025 5:59 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
5:59 better than the field: 6:41 faster on the clock, against 0:42 faster for everyone.
The fieldCompare these two →0:42 faster This athlete6:41 faster -
Birmingham22 Oct 2025Individual Pro · Men1:17:2298/156Beat 37%
↑ 145 days after Cardiff 2025 7:00 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
7:00 better than the field: 7:53 faster on the clock, against 0:53 faster for everyone.
The fieldCompare these two →0:53 faster This athlete7:53 faster -
Rome26 Sep 2025Individual Open · Men1:14:30377/1367Beat 72%
-
Cardiff30 May 2025Individual Pro · Men1:25:15172/225Beat 24%
↑ 27 days after London 2025 7:03 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
The race was 1:11 slower for everyone and the clock still says 5:52 faster: 7:03 gained on the field.
The fieldCompare these two →1:11 slower This athlete5:52 faster -
London3 May 2025Individual Pro · Men1:31:07198/229Beat 14%