Progress against the field
From London 2024 to Birmingham 2026, Emma Wilson got 1:09 faster than the field.
Over the same races everyone got 12:42 quicker, so 13:51 faster on the clock looks better than it was.
The longest gap between two races compared here, 283 days between Manchester 2026 and Birmingham 2026, still ended 3:56 ahead of the field.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown. The summary above covers Individual Open · Women, the one raced most; every comparison is in the list below.
Every race
21 races · 15 events
-
Birmingham31 Oct 2026Individual Open · Women1:11:39 PB44/887Beat 95%
↑ 283 days after Manchester 2026 3:56 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
8:37 faster on the clock, and the race was 4:41 faster for everyone, so 3:56 of it was this athlete.
The fieldCompare these two →4:41 faster This athlete8:37 faster -
Birmingham31 Oct 2026Doubles Open · Women1:10:15107/1246Beat 91%
↑ 353 days after Dublin 2025, with Hope Ramsden 2:48 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
2:48 behind the field: 2:09 slower on the clock, against 0:39 faster for everyone.
The fieldCompare these two →0:39 faster This pair2:09 slower -
Warsaw16 Apr 2026Doubles Open · Mixed1:06:55 PB49/261Beat 81%
-
Glasgow11 Mar 2026Doubles Open · Women1:54:22447/487Beat 8%
-
Manchester21 Jan 2026Individual Open · Women1:20:1632/263Beat 88%
↑ 91 days after Birmingham 2025 5:39 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
5:39 behind the field: 4:04 slower on the clock, against 1:35 faster for everyone.
The fieldCompare these two →1:35 faster This athlete4:04 slower -
London Excel4 Dec 2025Doubles Pro · Women1:02:59 PB15/339Beat 96%
-
London Excel4 Dec 2025Individual Pro · Women1:20:26 PB94/283Beat 67%
-
Madrid27 Nov 2025Relay · Women1:14:1412/48Beat 75%
-
Dublin12 Nov 2025Doubles Open · Women1:08:0632/719Beat 96%
-
Birmingham22 Oct 2025Doubles Open · Women1:00:05 PB3/904Beat 100%
-
Birmingham22 Oct 2025Doubles Open · Mixed1:08:00148/954Beat 85%
-
Birmingham22 Oct 2025Individual Open · Women1:16:1273/829Beat 91%
↑ 145 days after Cardiff 2025 4:50 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
4:50 better than the field: 6:36 faster on the clock, against 1:46 faster for everyone.
The fieldCompare these two →1:46 faster This athlete6:36 faster -
Cardiff30 May 2025Individual Open · Women1:22:48108/400Beat 73%
↑ 182 days after London 2024 1:58 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
2:42 faster on the clock, yet the race was 4:40 faster for everyone, so 1:58 was lost on the field.
The fieldCompare these two →4:40 faster This athlete2:42 faster -
Berlin16 May 2025Doubles Open · Women1:02:106/541Beat 99%
-
Glasgow12 Mar 2025Doubles Open · Women1:18:30247/1051Beat 77%
-
Glasgow12 Mar 2025Doubles Open · Women1:01:125/796Beat 99%
-
Glasgow12 Mar 2025Relay · Mixed1:21:3032/46Beat 30%
-
London29 Nov 2024Individual Open · Women1:25:30220/590Beat 63%
-
Dublin15 Nov 2024Doubles Open · Women1:20:36217/560Beat 61%
-
Birmingham25 Oct 2024Doubles Open · Women1:03:141/397Beat 100%
-
Stockholm2 Dec 2023Individual Open · Women1:28:1374/128Beat 42%